An analysis of john proctors character and intolerance theme in the crucible by arthur miller

Page Number and Citation:

(or Picky, Picky, Picky...)

Click the character infographic to download. But we can see why. Back in the day, he had everything your average Puritan man could want: Proctor was a stand-up guy who spoke his mind.

Around town, his name was synonymous with honor and integrity. He took pleasure in exposing hypocrisy and was respected for it. Most importantly, John Proctor respected himself. What could possibly go wrong? Proctor was super ill, btw and, before he knew it, his good life was bad, bad, bad.

John made the mistake of committing adultery with her. To make things worse, it was also lechery Proctor was in his thirties and Abigail was just seventeen—yuck. When we first meet John Proctor halfway through Act I, we discover a man who has become the thing he hates most in the world: He is caged by guilt.

In fact, it is his journey from guilt to redemption that forms the central spine of The Crucible. John Proctor is a classic Arthur Miller hero: John, what got into you?

Miller seems to hint at this in the first scene where we see them together. She and the other girls were just in the woods having a dance party with Tituba.

This would be in keeping with his personality. We see him challenging authority, from Parris to Danforth, throughout the play. Man of Action John Proctor is a passive protagonist; for the first two acts, he does little to affect the main action of the play. Read more on this in our "Character Roles" section.

Proctor goes to court armed with three main weapons. This would stain her now saintly reputation and discredit her in the eyes of the court.

Between the wily machinations of Abigail and the bullheadedness of the court, all of these tactics fail. John only ends up publicly staining his good name and getting himself condemned for witchcraft.

He feels a greater duty to his community and proceeds anyway. He has publicly embraced his sin. In Act IV, Proctor conquers the final hurdle on his path to redemption.

John Proctor in The Crucible

This is no easy task; he stumbles a bit along the way. In order to save his life, he is tempted into admitting that he is indeed in league with the Devil. I have been thinking I would confess to them, Elizabeth.

If I give them that? I cannot judge you, John. What would you have me do? As you will, I would have it. I want you living, John. It is a pretense, Elizabeth [ It is a fraud.is and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her.

Intolerance In The Crucible

I've been working with the materials of the Salem Witch Trials of for so long as an academic historian, it's not surprising when people ask me if I've seen the play or film The Crucible, and what I think of caninariojana.com created works of art, inspired by actual events, for his own artistic/political intentions.

Find related themes, quotes, symbols, characters, and more. Get everything you need to know about John Proctor in The Crucible. Analysis, related quotes, timeline. The character of John Proctor in The Crucible from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes The Crucible by Arthur Miller.

Upgrade to A + Download this Lit Guide!

(PDF. John Proctor would have lived a relatively quiet life if it was not for the witch trials.

The trials required Proctor to testify and share secrets of his life that he would rather not share, especially his affair. Thus one intolerance resulted in another, and he was caught up in the chaos of the moment. Francis Nurse, Giles Corey, and John Proctor are all examples of experiencing this intolerance of the court in a direct manner.

In these contexts, the idea of silencing voices, preventing full discourse and denying a sense of humanity becomes the key elements of . The Crucible, a play by Arthur Miller that was first produced in , is based on the true story of the Salem Witch Trials of Miller wrote the play to parallel the situations in the mid-twentieth century of Alger Hiss, Owen Latimore, Julius and Ethel Rosenburg, and Senator McCarthy, if only suggestively.