Should a city try to preserve

Overnight parking is not allowed without a permit obtained while making camping reservations for the Ohlone Wilderness.

Should a city try to preserve

Tuesday, 25 October You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? What is your viewpoint on this issue? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

You should write at least words. Some people think that old, historic buildings are no need for the city and they should be destroyed and replaced with modern ones. However, other people believe that historic buildings must be preserved in order to know and remember our past.

For several reasons that I will mention bellow I agree with those people who want to preserve old, historical buildings.

First of all, by preserving historical buildings we pass our history to our future generations. I think that out children should know their history, learn from it and respect it.

People need to know their traditions and customs, which are priceless and irreplaceable. Our history is our knowledge and Should a city try to preserve. In my opinion, we need to preserve and restore historical buildings. By destroying them we show our disrespect to our forefathers and their traditions.

Second of all, by preserving historical buildings a city can attract many travellers. Welcoming tourists a city can get many benefits including money, which can be spent on preserving historical buildings as well as on improving roads and facilities.

Every city has its own tradition and history which is reflected through the art and creation of the building mostly. Destroying those heritage means destroying the old value and history.

Also, many tourists mean a lot of new business opportunities.

Should a city try to preserve

Another important aspect of this is that businessmen will be willing to build new recreational centres, hotels, movie theatres, shopping centres to make a city more attractive for travellers. In addition to those practical benefits, many people will have the opportunity to get a job.

All this is good for the economy of the city. To sum up, I believe that preserving old, historical buildings can bring only benefits to a city and all humankind.

Oroville City | Education

Approximately words This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one example out of many possible answers.

Modernization has resulted in rapid expansion of cities, which has left its heritage and culture behind. Day by day new commercial complexes and other buildings are coming up in the place of older buildings.

Sometimes historically significant buildings have been demolished to build new structures. This has stirred into an interesting debate on whether the historic buildings should become a prey of modernization or not. Firstly, conserving historical building is a means of transferring ancestral legacy to the future generations.

Knowing our history and giving respect to it is very much important to advocate patriotism in young people. Secondly, such buildings will attract more tourists, hence, the tourism industry will grow. This brings more money, thus improves the lives of people over there.

This money could be used to preserve and renovate such buildings. Additionally, a city becomes well known among other parts and this increases chances of getting more funds and investments. Finally, increased tourism means increased income. Apart from bringing more money, it increases employment opportunities too.

In my opinion, by preserving such buildings would greatly benefit to the economy and also teaches future generations about their history, culture and traditions. Furthermore, it significantly contributes to infrastructure developments and modernization, at the same time allows saving the cultural beauty.

It is believed that old, historic buildings are not useful to the community and they occupy space in an already premium location.

Should a city try to preserve

Take Colosseum of Rome for example, the building occupies a lot of space in the middle of a city but it has more advantages that compensates for the loss of premium due to land cost. It can be argued that the contemporary buildings have more advantages than disadvantages by analysing the impact due to culture and revenue from tourism in these buildings.Nov 23,  · At the top of your Opera window, near the web address, you should see a gray location caninariojana.com it.

In the window that pops up, click Clear This Setting; You're good to go! Reload this Yelp page and try your search again. Watch Hill, Rhode Island Photo Credit: South Country RI / Myrna George.

Aristotle: Politics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Watch Hill, Rhode Island (about miles from New York City) Sunsets are dramatic from the . Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? What is your viewpoint on this issue? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

You should write at least words. The following is a quick comparison table of the best organic coffee brands available on the market. Welcome! The SouthEast Connector is a Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) of Washoe County road improvement project located in Reno, Nevada.

News Tribune | Central MO Breaking News